Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 59.8 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Samsung |
| Windows Phone 8 | -- |
| 2012-09-05 | 2019-03-15 |
| 4.87 x 2.70 x 0.39 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.64 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gray, Purple, Red, White and Yellow | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 209.00 | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.3 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 480 x 800 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 217 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8960 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Krait (Dual-Core 1500 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB (500 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 225 (400 MHz) GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 8.37 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 8 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 5.06 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 0.30 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.31 inches (1/3.2") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.25 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.9 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1650mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 360 hours standby time 15.4 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.52 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 3.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A50 has an overall score of 83.8, which is a lot better than the Lumia 820's 59.8 general score. The Galaxy A50 body is newer and incredibly thinner than Lumia 820's, but it's also a little heavier. Galaxy A50 has a little bit better display than Lumia 820, because it has a way better quantity of pixels per display inch, a lot better resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels and a way larger screen.
Samsung Galaxy A50 features much more storage for applications and games than Lumia 820, because it has 128 GB internal memory and an external memory card slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB. The Samsung Galaxy A50 counts with a quite better performance than Lumia 820, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics processing unit, it also counts with a higher amount of RAM and more CPU cores.
Galaxy A50 shoots much clearer photos and videos than Lumia 820, and although they both have the same video definition and the same video frame rates, the Galaxy A50 also has a bigger sensor capturing better quality videos and pictures, a lot larger aperture and a back camera with much more megapixels.
Galaxy A50 counts with a very superior battery performance than Nokia Lumia 820, because it has a 4000mAh battery size.
The Galaxy A50 is not only the best phones of the ones we are comparing here, but it's also the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.