Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 62 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | |
| Windows Phone 8 | -- |
| 2013-05-14 | 2018-10-18 |
| 5.08 x 2.78 x 0.33 inches | 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches |
| 4.90 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Black, Pink and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 160.00 | $ 157.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.5 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 768 x 1280 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 332 pixels per inch | 439 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8960 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Krait (Dual-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB (500 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 225 (400 MHz) GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.37 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 4.4 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 8.70 MP + 1.20 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.58 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2000mAh Battery | 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 432 hours standby time 18.3 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.92 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 3.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3 is much better than Nokia Lumia 925, with a general score of 80 against 62. Google Pixel 3's construction is incredibly newer and a little thinner, but also just a little bit heavier than Nokia Lumia 925. The Google Pixel 3 features a greater hardware performance than Nokia Lumia 925, because although it has doesn't have a graphics co-processor, it also counts with a larger number of cores (and they are faster) and a larger amount of RAM memory.
Nokia Lumia 925 counts with a slightly better looking display than Google Pixel 3, although it has a little bit smaller screen, a little bit less pixels per inch in the display and a lot worse resolution of 1280 x 768px. Google Pixel 3 counts with a very superior memory for games and applications than Lumia 925, because it has more internal memory.
The Google Pixel 3 has a much better battery lifetime than Nokia Lumia 925, because it has 2915mAh of battery capacity. The Google Pixel 3 has a much better camera than Lumia 925, because it has a bigger camera sensor, a bigger camera aperture to take better captures in low-light environments, a back facing camera with a much better 12.2 mega-pixels resolution and a lot better (4K) video quality.
The Google Pixel 3 is not only the best phones of the ones we are comparing, but it's also a bit cheaper, which makes this phone a simple decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.