Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 62 | 78.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | |
| Windows Phone 8 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2013-05-14 | 2019-05-07 |
| 5.08 x 2.78 x 0.33 inches | 6.30 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches |
| 4.90 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Black, Purple and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 160.00 | $ 167.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 768 x 1280 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 332 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8960 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| Krait (Dual-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB (500 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 225 (400 MHz) GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 8.37 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 4.4 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 8.70 MP + 1.20 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.58 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2000mAh Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 432 hours standby time 18.3 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.92 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 3.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3a XL has an overall score of 78.9, which is way better than Nokia Lumia 925's general score of 62. The Google Pixel 3a XL comes with Android 11 operating system, and Nokia Lumia 925 has Windows Phone 8 operating system. The Google Pixel 3a XL is a newer and just a little bit thinner phone than Nokia Lumia 925, but it's somewhat heavier.
Nokia Lumia 925 features a bit sharper screen than Google Pixel 3a XL, although it has a lot worse 1280 x 768 resolution, a just a bit lower pixel count per inch of display and a really smaller display. Google Pixel 3a XL counts with a much bigger memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Lumia 925, because it has more internal memory.
Google Pixel 3a XL features a little bit better performance than Nokia Lumia 925, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics co-processor, it also counts with a larger amount of RAM and a larger number of cores. The Google Pixel 3a XL features a very superior battery lifetime than Lumia 925, because it has a 3700mAh battery size.
The Google Pixel 3a XL shoots better photographs and videos than Nokia Lumia 925, because it has a bigger sensor, a back camera with a much higher resolution, a way higher 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a bigger aperture.
Google Pixel 3a XL costs a bit more than Nokia Lumia 925, but you can get a much better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.