Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 62 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Samsung |
| Windows Phone 8 | -- |
| 2013-05-14 | 2018-03-16 |
| 5.08 x 2.78 x 0.33 inches | 5.81 x 2.70 x 0.33 inches |
| 4.90 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Burgundy red, Coral blue, Ice blue, Lilac purple, Midnight black, Sunrise gold and Titanium gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 160.00 | $ 158.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 768 x 1280 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 332 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8960 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Krait (Dual-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB (500 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 225 (400 MHz) GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.37 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 4.4 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 8.70 MP + 1.20 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.58 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 432 hours standby time 18.3 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 3.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S9 is a lot better than Nokia Lumia 925, having a overall score of 83.3 against 62. The Galaxy S9 design has the same thickness than Nokia Lumia 925, but it is heavier. The Galaxy S9 counts with a superior processing unit than Lumia 925, because although it has doesn't have a GPU, it also counts with a larger number of cores and a greater amount of RAM memory.
Galaxy S9 has a little bit better screen than Lumia 925, because it has a much better 1440 x 2960px resolution, way more pixels per inch of screen and a bigger display. The Galaxy S9 captures better photos and videos than Nokia Lumia 925, because it has a lot bigger camera aperture for better low-light images and video, a bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors, a much higher (4K) video resolution and a lot more MP camera.
Galaxy S9 features a much greater memory to install applications and games than Lumia 925, because it has a slot for external memory cards that admits up to 400 GB and more internal memory capacity. The Samsung Galaxy S9 has a much better battery performance than Lumia 925, because it has 3000mAh of battery capacity.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, the Galaxy S9 is also the cheapest one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.