Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 68 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | LG |
| Windows Phone 8 | -- |
| 2014-02-12 | 2018-06-08 |
| 5.39 x 2.79 x 0.39 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Black and White | Black and Gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 8974-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 5.8 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 1.20 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.40 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EV-DO A, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.2 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2420mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 432 hours standby time 16.4 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.4 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V35 ThinQ is better than the Lumia Icon, with a score of 81.3 against 68. The LG V35 ThinQ is a notably newer cellphone, and it's also extremely thinner and a little lighter than Lumia Icon. The LG V35 ThinQ has a little faster processor than Nokia Lumia Icon, because although it has doesn't have a graphics processing unit, it also counts with more processing cores and a larger amount of RAM memory.
Lumia Icon features a bit better looking screen than LG V35 ThinQ, although it has a quite smaller screen, a little bit worse pixels density and a much lower resolution of 1920 x 1080px. The LG V35 ThinQ features just a bit better camera than Lumia Icon, because although it has a camera with less mega-pixels and a smaller sensor providing a worse image quality, it also counts with a lot larger aperture for better photos and videos in low-light environments and a much better 3840x2160 video quality.
The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a much bigger memory to store more games and applications than Nokia Lumia Icon, because it has 32 GB more internal memory capacity and an external memory slot that allows up to 1,95 TB. The LG V35 ThinQ has a very superior battery performance than Lumia Icon, because it has a 3300mAh battery size instead of 2420mAh.
LG V35 ThinQ is a little more expensive than Lumia Icon, but it's still a good choice, because you can get a lot more for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.