Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 68 | 74.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Motorola |
| Windows Phone 8 | Android 5.1 |
| 2014-02-12 | 2015-10-27 |
| 5.39 x 2.79 x 0.39 inches | 5.90 x 3.07 x 0.36 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Black and White | Black and White |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 249.00 | $ 135.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 5.4 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 544 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 9.1 | 9.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 8974-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 430 GPU |
| 9.18 | 8.37 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 5.8 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 1.20 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.40 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.46 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EV-DO A, GSM and CDMA | LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EV-DO A, EDGE, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.2 | 6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2420mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 3760mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 432 hours standby time 16.4 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.4 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola DROID Turbo 2 is slightly better than Lumia Icon, with a general score of 74.8 against 68. Motorola DROID Turbo 2 has Android 5.1 OS, and Lumia Icon has Windows Phone 8 OS. The Motorola DROID Turbo 2 body is newer and just a bit thinner than Lumia Icon's, but it's also a bit heavier. The Nokia Lumia Icon has just a little better hardware performance than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, it also counts with an additional GPU and a larger number of cores.
Motorola DROID Turbo 2 counts with a bit better looking display than Lumia Icon, because it has a higher resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels, a little bit greater number of pixels in each inch of screen and a bit bigger screen. Motorola DROID Turbo 2 has a superior memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Lumia Icon, because it has more internal storage capacity and a slot for SD memory cards that supports up to 1,95 TB.
Motorola DROID Turbo 2 has a much better battery life than Nokia Lumia Icon, because it has a 3760mAh battery capacity against 2420mAh. Motorola DROID Turbo 2 counts with just a bit better camera than Nokia Lumia Icon, because it has a larger diafragm aperture, a way better video resolution and a higher resolution back-facing camera.
Motorola DROID Turbo 2 not only is the best phones of the ones we are comparing here, but it's also very cheap compared to the other ones, which makes buying this phone an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.