Search


Compare phones

Global Score
23.725.6
Basic Information
NokiaMotorola
Symbian 6.1--
2004-04-142008-01-07
4.65 x 2.68 x 0.87 inches3.70 x 1.70 x 0.60 inches
5.05 ounces3.30 ounces
$ 150.00$ 100.00
176 x 208 pixels 128 x 128 pixels
LCDSTN
No touch screenNo touch screen
2.93
processor processor
GPU GPU
5.765.76
Storage
3,48 MB internal memory--
MMC external memory slotmicroSD external memory slot
0.10
GPRS and GSMGPRS and GSM
SIMSIM
0.20.2
Battery Life
1070mAh Li-Ion Battery940mAh Li-Ion Battery
Removable BatteryRemovable Battery
264 hours standby time
5 hours talk time
450 hours standby time
9 hours talk time
2.722.48
Other Features
Bluetooth 1.1--

Comparison review

The Motorola W270 has a global score of 25.6, which is a little bit better than Nokia N-Gage QD's 23.7 general score. Motorola W270's construction is a lot newer, incredibly thinner and extremely lighter than Nokia N-Gage QD. Motorola W270 has just a bit better looking display than Nokia N-Gage QD, although it has a much lower 128 x 128 resolution.

The Motorola W270 features a processor that's very similar to the Nokia N-Gage QD one, they have 0 cores. Nokia N-Gage QD features a lot bigger storage to store more games and applications than Motorola W270, although it has no external memory card slot. The Nokia N-Gage QD and the Motorola W270 both count with extremely similar cameras.

The Nokia N-Gage QD counts with just a bit longer battery lifetime than Motorola W270, because it has 1070mAh of battery capacity.

In addition to being the best phone of the ones we are comparing here, the Motorola W270 is also very cheap compared to the other ones.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.