Search


Compare phones

Global Score
23.724.7
Basic Information
NokiaMotorola
Symbian 6.1--
2004-04-142006-04-04
4.65 x 2.68 x 0.87 inches3.30 x 1.81 x 0.82 inches
5.05 ounces2.99 ounces
$ 150.00$ 75.00
176 x 208 pixels 128 x 160 pixels
LCDSTN
No touch screenNo touch screen
2.93
processor processor
GPU GPU
5.765.76
Storage
3,48 MB internal memory--
MMC external memory slotNo SD card slot
0.10
GPRS and GSMCDMA
SIM--
0.20.1
Battery Life
1070mAh Li-Ion Battery850mAh Li-Ion Battery
Removable BatteryRemovable Battery
264 hours standby time
5 hours talk time
212 hours standby time
3.5 hours talk time
2.722.32
Other Features
Bluetooth 1.1--
--GPS

Comparison review

Motorola W315 is slightly better than the Nokia N-Gage QD, having a score of 24.7 against 23.7. The Motorola W315 construction is newer, just a little bit thinner and noticeably lighter than Nokia N-Gage QD. Motorola W315 counts with a bit sharper screen than Nokia N-Gage QD, although it has a lot worse 160 x 128 resolution.

Nokia N-Gage QD has a way bigger memory for apps and games than Motorola W315. The Nokia N-Gage QD and the Motorola W315 count with extremely similar processors, both have a 0-Core processor. Nokia N-Gage QD counts with better battery life than Motorola W315, because it has a 26 percent bigger battery size.

The Motorola W315 has a camera that is very similar to the camera in Nokia N-Gage QD.

Motorola W315 is not only the best devices of the ones we are comparing, but it's also a bargain compared to the other ones.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.