Search


Compare phones

Global Score
32.936.1
Basic Information
NokiaMotorola
Symbian 8.1--
2005-04-272007-05-15
4.28 x 2.08 x 0.89 inches4.05 x 2.08 x 0.52 inches
4.44 ounces4.40 ounces
$ 489.00$ 290.00
Display / Screen
--2.2 inches
176 x 208 pixels 240 x 320 pixels (QVGA)
TFTTFT
151 pixels per inch182 pixels per inch
No touch screenNo touch screen
5.86.1
processor processor
GPU GPU
5.765.76
Storage
22,53 MB internal memory46,08 MB internal memory
RS-MMC (up to 64 GB) external memory slotmicroSD external memory slot
2.060.4
Camera
2.00 MP2.00 MP
--220 x 176 video resolution
4.734.84
UMTS, EDGE and GSMHSDPA, UMTS, EDGE and GSM
SIMSIM
0.40.9
Battery Life
970mAh Li-Ion Battery950mAh Li-Ion Battery
Removable BatteryRemovable Battery
264 hours standby time
3.5 hours talk time
260 hours standby time
3.4 hours talk time
2.562.48
Other Features
Bluetooth 2.0Bluetooth 2.0
FM Radio--

Comparison review

The Motorola RAZR2 V9 has an overall score of 36.1, which is a bit better than the Nokia N70's 32.9 overall score. Motorola RAZR2 V9 is a much newer cellphone, and it's also a bit lighter and notably thinner than the Nokia N70. The Nokia N70 and the Motorola RAZR2 V9 both feature similar processors, both have a 0-Core processor.

The Motorola RAZR2 V9 features a bit sharper display than Nokia N70, because it has a much better resolution of 320 x 240px and a bit higher display density. Nokia N70 features much more memory capacity for applications and games than Motorola RAZR2 V9, although it has just 22,53 MB internal memory capacity.

Nokia N70 features just a little better battery life than Motorola RAZR2 V9, because it has a 2% greater battery capacity. Motorola RAZR2 V9 shoots just a bit better pictures and videos than Nokia N70. Both have a 2 mega-pixels back-facing camera.

In addition to being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, the Motorola RAZR2 V9 is also by far the cheapest.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.