Search


Compare phones

Global Score
29.932
Basic Information
NokiaNokia
Symbian 8.1--
2006-04-252009-05-18
4.28 x 2.10 x 0.68 inches3.66 x 1.81 x 0.70 inches
4.37 ounces3.19 ounces
--Black and Red
$ 249.00$ 195.00
Display / Screen
--1.8 inches
176 x 208 pixels 128 x 160 pixels
TFTTFT
--114 pixels per inch
No touch screenNo touch screen
3.15.3
processor processor
GPU GPU
5.765.76
Storage
20,48 MB internal memory9,22 MB internal memory
RS-MMC external memory slotNo SD card slot
0.30.2
Camera
2.00 MP1.30 MP
352 x 288 video resolution--
4.734.51
EDGE and GSMEDGE and GSM
SIMSIM
0.30.3
Battery Life
970mAh Li-Ion Battery860mAh Li-Ion Battery
Removable BatteryRemovable Battery
260 hours standby time
3.6 hours talk time
432 hours standby time
5 hours talk time
2.562.32
Other Features
Bluetooth 2.0Bluetooth 2.0
FM RadioFM Radio

Comparison review

Nokia 2720 fold is slightly better than the Nokia N72, getting a score of 32 against 29.9. The Nokia 2720 fold body is way newer and noticeably lighter, but also just a little thicker than Nokia N72. Nokia 2720 fold counts with a CPU that's very similar to the CPU in Nokia N72, they have a 0-Core CPU.

The Nokia 2720 fold features a much more vibrant screen than Nokia N72, although it has a much lower 160 x 128 pixels resolution. The Nokia N72 counts with a lot bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Nokia 2720 fold, because it has 11,26 MB more internal storage. Nokia N72 shoots just a bit better videos and photos than Nokia 2720 fold, because it has a lot better 2 mega pixels resolution back facing camera.

Nokia N72 counts with longer battery performance than Nokia 2720 fold, because it has a 13 percent larger battery capacity.

Despite of being the best phone in our current comparison, Nokia 2720 fold is also by far the cheapest one.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.