Global Score | |
31.2 | 34.1 |
Basic Information | |
Nokia | Nokia |
Symbian 9.1 | -- |
2006-04-25 | 2009-05-18 |
4.33 x 1.92 x 0.74 inches | 4.31 x 1.85 x 0.57 inches |
4.09 ounces | 3.09 ounces |
$ 460.00 | $ 199.00 |
Display / Screen | |
-- | 2 inches |
240 x 320 pixels (QVGA) | 240 x 320 pixels (QVGA) |
TFT | TFT |
-- | 200 pixels per inch |
No touch screen | No touch screen |
3.1 | 6.3 |
processor | processor |
-- | 32 MB RAM |
GPU | GPU |
5.76 | 5.76 |
Storage | |
43,01 MB internal memory | 30,72 MB internal memory |
miniSD external memory slot | microSD (up to 2 GB) external memory slot |
0.4 | 0.84 |
Camera | |
3.20 MP | 2.00 MP |
f/2.80 aperture | -- |
352 x 288 video resolution | -- |
5.94 | 4.73 |
UMTS, EDGE and GSM | UMTS, EDGE and GSM |
SIM | SIM |
0.4 | 0.4 |
Battery Life | |
1100mAh Li-Ion Battery | 1020mAh Li-Ion Battery |
Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
348 hours standby time 3.8 hours talk time | 396 hours standby time 7.4 hours talk time |
2.72 | 2.64 |
Other Features | |
Bluetooth 2.0 | Bluetooth 2.0, EDR |
Infra-red port | -- |
Nokia 2730 classic US has an overall score of 34.1, which is a little bit better than Nokia N73's global score of 31.2. Nokia 2730 classic US is a way newer cellphone, and it's also notably thinner and notably lighter than the Nokia N73. The Nokia 2730 classic US's processing unit is just as good as the CPU in Nokia N73, both of them have the same number of cores.
The Nokia 2730 classic US counts with a much sharper display than Nokia N73. They have an equal 320 x 240 resolution. Nokia N73 features a way better camera than Nokia 2730 classic US, because it has a way higher resolution back-facing camera. Nokia 2730 classic US counts with a superior memory to install applications and games than Nokia N73, although it has 0 less internal storage capacity.
Nokia N73 counts with a little better battery life than Nokia 2730 classic US, because it has an 8% more battery capacity.
The Nokia 2730 classic US not only is the best phones between the ones we are comparing, but it's also by far the cheapest one.
Despite our efforts to provide accurate information in our reviews and specs, there may be errors or missing information in this website, please check the specifications the brand or seller provide with the product before you buy it. We are not responsible for any inconvinience resulting on the use of this website's information.
Certain content that appears on this site comes from Amazon Services LLC. This content is provided 'as is' and is subject to change or removal at any time.