Compare phones
|
|
| Global Score | |
| 31.2 | 34.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Samsung |
| Symbian 9.1 | -- |
| 2006-04-25 | 2009-02-16 |
| 4.33 x 1.92 x 0.74 inches | 3.70 x 1.83 x 0.73 inches |
| 4.09 ounces | 3.00 ounces |
| $ 460.00 | $ 75.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| -- | 1.8 inches |
| 240 x 320 pixels (QVGA) | 128 x 160 pixels |
| TFT | TFT |
| -- | 114 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 3.1 | 5.4 |
| processor | processor |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| Storage | |
| 43,01 MB internal memory | 9,22 MB internal memory |
| miniSD external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 0.4 | 0.2 |
| Camera | |
| 3.20 MP | 0.30 MP |
| f/2.80 aperture | -- |
| 352 x 288 video resolution | -- |
| 5.94 | 3.63 |
| UMTS, EDGE and GSM | GPRS and GSM |
| SIM | SIM |
| 0.4 | 0.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1100mAh Li-Ion Battery | 800mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 348 hours standby time 3.8 hours talk time | 192 hours standby time 7 hours talk time |
| 2.72 | 2.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 2.0 | -- |
| Infra-red port | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung E2210 has a global score of 34.1, which is just a bit better than the Nokia N73's 31.2 general score. Samsung E2210 is a incredibly newer cellphone, and it's also incredibly lighter and just a little thinner than Nokia N73. Samsung E2210 counts with a much more vibrant screen than Nokia N73, although it has a lot worse resolution of 160 x 128.
Nokia N73 counts with a way bigger storage capacity to install games and applications than Samsung E2210, because it has 33,79 MB more internal memory. Samsung E2210 counts with a processing unit that's just as good as the CPU in Nokia N73, they have the same number of cores. The Nokia N73 has a much longer battery life than Samsung E2210, because it has a 1100mAh battery capacity instead of 800mAh.
Nokia N73 captures much better photographs and videos than Samsung E2210, because it has a camera with a much higher 3.2 MP resolution.
Samsung E2210 is not only the best phones in our comparison, but it's also by far the cheapest one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.