Search


Compare phones

Global Score
3436.8
Basic Information
NokiaSamsung
Symbian 9.1--
2006-09-262009-08-06
3.74 x 2.04 x 0.79 inches3.90 x 2.37 x 0.59 inches
4.35 ounces3.50 ounces
$ 100.00$ 90.00
Display / Screen
2.4 inches2.6 inches
240 x 320 pixels (QVGA)320 x 240 pixels (QVGA)
TFTTFT
167 pixels per inch154 pixels per inch
No touch screenNo touch screen
6.35.9
processor processor
GPU GPU
5.765.76
Storage
61,44 MB internal memory--
microSD external memory slotmicroSD, microSDHC external memory slot
0.50
Camera
2.00 MP2.00 MP
f/2.80 aperture--
5.54.73
UMTS, EDGE and GSMCDMA
SIM--
0.40.1
Battery Life
800mAh Li-Ion Battery1000mAh Li-Ion Battery
Removable BatteryRemovable Battery
200 hours standby time
4.2 hours talk time
6 hours talk time
2.242.56
Other Features
Bluetooth 2.0Bluetooth 2.0
--GPS
Infra-red port--
FM Radio--

Comparison review

Samsung Reclaim has an overall score of 36.8, which is just a bit better than the Nokia N75's global score of 34. Samsung Reclaim is a way newer cellphone, and it is also a lot thinner and lighter than the Nokia N75. The Samsung Reclaim and Nokia N75 feature similar processing units, both of them have a 0-Core CPU.

The Nokia N75 features a bit more vivid display than Samsung Reclaim, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, and they both have the same resolution of 320 x 240 pixels, the Nokia N75 also counts with a little higher display pixel density. Nokia N75 features a much greater storage to store more apps and games than Samsung Reclaim, although it has no slot for an external memory card.

Samsung Reclaim features superior battery lifetime than Nokia N75, because it has a 1000mAh battery size. Nokia N75 counts with a superior camera than Samsung Reclaim. Both of them have the same resolution camera.

Even being the best phone of the ones we are comparing here, Samsung Reclaim is also the cheapest one.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.