Search


Compare phones

Global Score
31.434.5
Basic Information
NokiaMotorola
Symbian 9.1--
2005-11-022006-07-25
3.75 x 1.96 x 0.92 inches4.15 x 1.79 x 0.62 inches
4.72 ounces4.05 ounces
$ 245.00$ 120.00
352 x 416 pixels 176 x 220 pixels
TFTTFT
--128 pixels per inch
No touch screenNo touch screen
3.15.6
processor processor
GPU GPU
5.765.76
Storage
61,44 MB internal memory20,48 MB internal memory
miniSD external memory slotmicroSD external memory slot
0.50.3
Camera
3.00 MP2.00 MP
f/3.50 aperture--
5.064.73
Networks
Wi-Fi--
UMTS, EDGE and GSMEDGE and GSM
SIMSIM
2.80.3
Battery Life
820mAh Li-Ion Battery780mAh Li-Ion Battery
Removable BatteryRemovable Battery
192 hours standby time
3 hours talk time
350 hours standby time
6.7 hours talk time
2.322.24
Other Features
Bluetooth 1.2Bluetooth 1.2
Infra-red port--

Comparison review

Motorola ROKR Z3 has a global score of 34.5, which is a little bit better than the Nokia N80's 31.4 general score. The Motorola ROKR Z3 construction is noticeably thinner and somewhat lighter than Nokia N80, even though both of them were released with only 9 months difference. The Motorola ROKR Z3 counts with a CPU that's very similar to the Nokia N80 one, both of them have 0 CPU cores.

Motorola ROKR Z3 counts with an incredibly better display than Nokia N80, although it has a much lower 220 x 176 pixels resolution. Nokia N80 features a superior memory capacity to install games and applications than Motorola ROKR Z3, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 61,44 MB internal memory capacity.

The Nokia N80 counts with a bit better camera than Motorola ROKR Z3, because it has a way more mega-pixels back facing camera. The Nokia N80 features a bit better battery duration than Motorola ROKR Z3, because it has 820mAh of battery capacity.

Despite of being the best phone of the ones we are comparing, the Motorola ROKR Z3 is also by far the cheapest.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.