Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 41.1 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | |
| Symbian 9.2 | -- |
| 2007-11-14 | 2019-10-24 |
| 4.40 x 1.97 x 0.68 inches | 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches |
| 4.02 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| -- | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 345.00 | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 2.4 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 240 x 320 pixels (QVGA) | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | OLED |
| 167 pixels per inch | 443 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 6.3 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| ARM11 (Single-Core 332 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 128 MB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| 3D Graphics HW accelerator GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 102,4 MB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 0.6 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 640 x 480 (30 fps) (VGA) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 6.82 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSDPA, UMTS, EDGE and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 3.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1050mAh Li-Ion Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 225 hours standby time 4.3 hours talk time | -- |
| 2.64 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 2.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Accelerometer | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4 is way better than Nokia N82, getting an 81.9 score against 41.1. Although Google Pixel 4 is much heavier than the Nokia N82, it's notably thinner and a lot newer. The Google Pixel 4 has a much more vibrant screen than Nokia N82, because it has a lot better amount of pixels per inch of display, a really larger display and a lot better resolution of 1080 x 2280.
Google Pixel 4 features a much greater storage capacity to store more apps and games than Nokia N82, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 64 GB internal memory. Google Pixel 4 has a lot better hardware performance than Nokia N82, because it has a greater amount of RAM memory and a larger number of faster cores.
The Google Pixel 4 captures way better pictures and videos than Nokia N82, because it has a way higher resolution back facing camera, a lot higher (4K) video definition and a lot larger diafragm aperture. The Google Pixel 4 has a way better battery performance than Nokia N82, because it has a 167% bigger battery size.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones we are comparing, the Google Pixel 4 is also a bit cheaper, making it an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.