Search


Compare phones

Global Score
32.142.3
Basic Information
NokiaHTC
Symbian 9.1Windows Mobile Standard 6.1
2005-11-022009-06-25
4.22 x 2.29 x 0.97 inches4.50 x 2.50 x 0.50 inches
6.73 ounces3.70 ounces
$ 70.00$ 70.00
Display / Screen
--2.4 inches
320 x 240 pixels (QVGA)320 x 240 pixels (QVGA)
TFTTFT
--167 pixels per inch
No touch screenNo touch screen
3.46
processor Single-Core 528 MHz processor
--192 MB RAM
GPU GPU
5.766.66
Storage
92,16 MB internal memory--
miniSD, MMC, RS-MMC external memory slotmicroSD, microSDHC external memory slot
0.60
Camera
2.00 MP2.00 MP
4.734.73
Networks
Wi-FiWi-Fi
UMTS, EDGE and GSMEV-DO A, EDGE, GSM and CDMA
SIMSIM
2.82.9
Battery Life
1500mAh Li-Ion Battery1500mAh Li-Ion Battery
Removable BatteryRemovable Battery
336 hours standby time
14 hours talk time
324 hours standby time
4.8 hours talk time
3.283.28
Other Features
Bluetooth 2.0Bluetooth 2.0, EDR
--GPS
Infra-red port--
Digital TV Broadcast--

Comparison review

The HTC Ozone has an overall score of 42.3, which is way better than the Nokia N92's 32.1 general score. The HTC Ozone comes with Windows Mobile Standard 6.1 OS, while Nokia N92 has Symbian 9.1 OS. The HTC Ozone is a a lot newer phone, and it's also noticeably thinner and incredibly lighter than Nokia N92.

The HTC Ozone has a much better screen than Nokia N92. Both have exactly the same resolution of 240 x 320 pixels. HTC Ozone counts with a faster CPU than Nokia N92, because it has 1 more processing cores. HTC Ozone's camera is just as good as the camera in Nokia N92, they have a same resolution back camera.

The Nokia N92 counts with a superior storage for apps and games than HTC Ozone, although it has no slot for an external memory card. Nokia N92 and HTC Ozone both feature quite similar battery performance.

The HTC Ozone and the Nokia N92 cost exactly the same, making this phone an easy choice.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.