Search


Compare phones

Global Score
32.143.5
Basic Information
NokiaNokia
Symbian 9.1--
2005-11-022012-02-27
4.22 x 2.29 x 0.97 inches4.54 x 2.32 x 0.53 inches
6.73 ounces3.74 ounces
--Black, Blue, Gray, Red and Yellow
$ 70.00$ 70.00
Display / Screen
--2.4 inches
320 x 240 pixels (QVGA)320 x 240 pixels (QVGA)
TFTTFT
--167 pixels per inch
No touch screenNo touch screen
3.46.2
processor Single-Core 1000 MHz processor
--128 MB RAM
GPU GPU
5.767.29
Storage
92,16 MB internal memory102,4 MB internal memory
miniSD, MMC, RS-MMC external memory slotmicroSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot
0.61.92
Camera
2.00 MP3.20 MP
--640 x 480 (15 fps) (VGA) video resolution
4.735.5
Networks
Wi-FiWi-Fi
UMTS, EDGE and GSMHSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM
SIMSIM
2.83.6
Battery Life
1500mAh Li-Ion Battery1430mAh Li-Ion Battery
Removable BatteryRemovable Battery
336 hours standby time
14 hours talk time
707 hours standby time
9 hours talk time
3.283.2
Other Features
Bluetooth 2.0Bluetooth 2.1, EDR
Infra-red port--
Digital TV Broadcast--

Comparison review

Nokia Asha 302 has a score of 43.5, which is a lot better than the Nokia N92's 32.1 score. Nokia Asha 302 is a much newer phone, and it's also notably thinner and much lighter than Nokia N92. The Nokia Asha 302 counts with a much sharper display than Nokia N92. Both have exactly the same resolution of 240 x 320.

Nokia Asha 302 has much more memory capacity for games and applications than Nokia N92, because it has 102,4 MB internal memory capacity. The Nokia Asha 302 counts with a much better performing processing unit than Nokia N92, because it has more processing cores. The Nokia Asha 302 counts with a superior camera than Nokia N92, because it has a way higher resolution back camera.

The Nokia N92 features a bit superior battery duration than Nokia Asha 302, because it has a 5% more battery capacity.

The Nokia Asha 302 costs the same than Nokia N92, making it a very good choice.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.