Compare phones
Samsung Chrono
SCH-R260, SCH-R261, SCH-R261A| Global Score | |
| 32.9 | 36.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Samsung |
| Symbian 9.1 | -- |
| 2006-04-25 | 0000-00-00 |
| 4.65 x 2.18 x 1.11 inches | 3.70 x 1.83 x 0.67 inches |
| 6.34 ounces | 3.14 ounces |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 250.00 | $ 80.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| -- | 2 inches |
| 240 x 320 pixels (QVGA) | 240 x 320 pixels (QVGA) |
| TFT | TFT |
| -- | 200 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 3.1 | 6.3 |
| processor | processor |
| GPU | ARM Mali-400 MP1 (320 MHz) GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.94 |
| Storage | |
| 51,2 MB internal memory | -- |
| miniSD external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 0.4 | 0 |
| Camera | |
| 3.20 MP | 0.30 MP |
| f/3.30 aperture | -- |
| 640 x 480 (30 fps) (VGA) video resolution | -- |
| 6.16 | 3.63 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | -- |
| UMTS, EDGE and GSM | CDMA |
| SIM | -- |
| 2.8 | 0.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1100mAh Li-Ion Battery | 800mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 240 hours standby time 5 hours talk time | 526 hours standby time 5 hours talk time |
| 2.72 | 2.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 2.0 | Bluetooth 2.1, EDR |
| -- | GPS |
| Infra-red port | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Chrono is just a bit better than the Nokia N93, with a 36.1 score against 32.9. The Samsung Chrono body is much thinner and notably lighter than the Nokia N93. The Samsung Chrono has a lot better display than Nokia N93. They have the same resolution of 320 x 240. Samsung Chrono counts with a bit better performance than Nokia N93, and although they both have 0 processing cores, the Samsung Chrono also has an extra graphics processor.
Nokia N93 features a way better camera than Samsung Chrono, because it has a back-facing camera with way more megapixels. The Nokia N93 counts with a much greater memory capacity to install applications and games than Samsung Chrono. The Nokia N93 has a superior battery performance than Samsung Chrono, because it has a 38% greater battery capacity.
Samsung Chrono not only is the best devices between the ones we are comparing here, but it's also by far the cheapest one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.