Global Score | |
32.9 | 36.1 |
Basic Information | |
Nokia | Sony |
Symbian 9.1 | -- |
2006-04-25 | 2007-02-06 |
4.65 x 2.18 x 1.11 inches | 4.17 x 1.88 x 0.66 inches |
6.34 ounces | 3.65 ounces |
$ 250.00 | $ 135.00 |
Display / Screen | |
-- | 2 inches |
240 x 320 pixels (QVGA) | 240 x 320 pixels (QVGA) |
TFT | TFD |
-- | 200 pixels per inch |
No touch screen | No touch screen |
3.1 | 6.3 |
processor | processor |
GPU | GPU |
5.76 | 5.76 |
Storage | |
51,2 MB internal memory | 65,54 MB internal memory |
miniSD external memory slot | Memory Stick Micro (M2) external memory slot |
0.4 | 0.5 |
Camera | |
3.20 MP | 3.20 MP |
f/3.30 aperture | -- |
640 x 480 (30 fps) (VGA) video resolution | -- |
6.16 | 5.17 |
Networks | |
Wi-Fi | -- |
UMTS, EDGE and GSM | UMTS, GPRS and GSM |
SIM | SIM |
2.8 | 0.2 |
Battery Life | |
1100mAh Li-Ion Battery | 950mAh Li-Polymer Battery |
Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
240 hours standby time 5 hours talk time | 400 hours standby time 10 hours talk time |
2.72 | 2.48 |
Other Features | |
Bluetooth 2.0 | Bluetooth 2.0 |
Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
Sony Ericsson K810 is slightly better than Nokia N93, with a overall score of 36.1 against 32.9. Sony Ericsson K810's construction is newer, noticeably thinner and noticeably lighter than Nokia N93. The Sony Ericsson K810 features an incredibly better display than Nokia N93. They have an equal resolution of 320 x 240px.
The Sony Ericsson K810 and Nokia N93 feature similar processors, they have a 0-Core processing unit. The Nokia N93 captures much better photos and videos than Sony Ericsson K810. Both of them have a same resolution back-facing camera. The Sony Ericsson K810 features a superior storage capacity for games and applications than Nokia N93, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 65,54 MB internal storage capacity.
Nokia N93 has just a little better battery performance than Sony Ericsson K810, because it has a 1100mAh battery size against 950mAh.
Sony Ericsson K810 is not only the best phones in our comparison, but it's also by far the cheapest one.
Despite our efforts to provide accurate information in our reviews and specs, there may be errors or missing information in this website, please check the specifications the brand or seller provide with the product before you buy it. We are not responsible for any inconvinience resulting on the use of this website's information.
Certain content that appears on this site comes from Amazon Services LLC. This content is provided 'as is' and is subject to change or removal at any time.