Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 43.2 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Samsung |
| Symbian 9.3 | -- |
| 2008-08-26 | 2018-03-16 |
| 4.05 x 2.16 x 0.70 inches | 5.81 x 2.70 x 0.33 inches |
| 4.40 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| -- | Burgundy red, Coral blue, Ice blue, Lilac purple, Midnight black, Sunrise gold and Titanium gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 155.00 | $ 158.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 2.8 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 240 x 320 pixels (QVGA) | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| TFT | Super AMOLED |
| 143 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 6.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM9 (Single-Core 264 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 128 MB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 6.03 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 4.4 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 640 x 480 (30 fps) (VGA) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 6.82 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSDPA, UMTS, EDGE and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 3.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 950mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 230 hours standby time 3.8 hours talk time | -- |
| 2.48 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 2.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S9 is way better than the Nokia N96 US, with an 83.3 score against 43.2. Although the Samsung Galaxy S9 is way heavier than the Nokia N96 US, it's much thinner and also way newer. Samsung Galaxy S9 counts with a very superior performance than Nokia N96 US, because it has more RAM and a larger number of cores (and they are faster).
Samsung Galaxy S9 has a much sharper screen than Nokia N96 US, because it has a lot bigger display, a much better 1440 x 2960 resolution and much more pixels per screen inch. Galaxy S9 shoots way better photos and videos than Nokia N96 US, because it has a much better resolution camera, a much bigger aperture to take better photos and videos in poorly lited situations and a way higher video definition.
The Galaxy S9 counts with a lot bigger memory capacity to store more apps and games than Nokia N96 US, because it has 64 GB internal storage capacity. Galaxy S9 features a really longer battery performance than Nokia N96 US, because it has 3000mAh of battery capacity instead of 950mAh.
Galaxy S9 costs a little more money than the Nokia N96 US, but it's still a convenient choice, as you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.