Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.3 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-11-09 | 2016-10-20 |
| 6.75 x 3.14 x 0.36 inches | 5.66 x 2.74 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.65 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Midnight Blue | Black, Gray and White |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 SM4350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.18 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.36 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4470mAh Nano SIM Battery | 2770mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel is slightly better than Nokia X100, having an 80.2 score against 77.3. The Google Pixel is an way older cellphone than the Nokia X100, but Google made it extremely lighter and just a bit thinner. The Google Pixel features a bit better display than Nokia X100, because although it has a way smaller display and a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 1920px, it also counts with a bit higher screen pixels density.
Nokia X100 has a way bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Pixel, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Nokia X100 also has a SD extension slot that admits up to 1 TB. The Nokia X100 counts with a bit better hardware performance than Google Pixel, because it has more cores (although they are slower) and more RAM memory.
Google Pixel counts with a superior camera than Nokia X100, although it has a much less MP camera in the back. The Nokia X100 has a very superior battery performance than Google Pixel, because it has a 4470mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.