Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.3 | 79.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 14 |
| 2021-11-09 | 2024-03-11 |
| 6.75 x 3.14 x 0.36 inches | 6.37 x 3.07 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.65 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Midnight Blue | -- |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 390 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 SM4350 chipset | Exynos 1380 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Mali-G68 MP5 GPU |
| 9.18 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.51 inches (1/1.96") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 8.36 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4470mAh Nano SIM Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G is slightly better than the Nokia X100, getting a 79.4 score against 77.3. Both devices in this comparison work with Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy A35 5G has the newer 14 version and Nokia X100 has Android 11, providing a couple nice extra features and increased performance. Samsung Galaxy A35 5G is a noticeably newer cellphone, and it's also somewhat thinner and a little bit lighter than Nokia X100.
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G counts with a slightly better display than Nokia X100, although it has a little less pixels per inch in the display, a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2340px and a quite smaller display. The Nokia X100 features a way bigger storage for applications and games than Galaxy A35 5G, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage, the Nokia X100 also has a slot for an external memory card that supports up to 1 TB.
Nokia X100 has a much better hardware performance than Galaxy A35 5G. They have 8 cores and the same RAM memory amount. The Galaxy A35 5G shoots much clearer videos and photos than Nokia X100, because it has a camera in the back with a better 50 MP resolution. Galaxy A35 5G has just a bit longer battery duration than Nokia X100, because it has a 12% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.