Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.3 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-11-09 | 2019-03-15 |
| 6.75 x 3.14 x 0.36 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.65 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Midnight Blue | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 SM4350 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.36 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4470mAh Nano SIM Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A50 is a little bit better than the Nokia X100, getting a overall score of 83.8 against 77.3. Even though Samsung Galaxy A50 is extremely older than the Nokia X100, it's design is somewhat thinner and much lighter. Samsung Galaxy A50 counts with a bit more vivid display than Nokia X100, because although it has a bit smaller screen and a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2340px, it also counts with a bit higher pixels quantity per inch in the screen.
The Samsung Galaxy A50 has a bit faster processor than Nokia X100, although it has 2 GB less RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. The Samsung Galaxy A50 takes much clearer photographs and videos than Nokia X100, although it has a camera with a way lower 25 mega-pixels resolution.
Nokia X100 features just a bit more memory for apps and games than Galaxy A50, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage, the Nokia X100 also has a slot for an external memory card that admits a maximum of 1 TB. The Nokia X100 features just a little better battery life than Samsung Galaxy A50, because it has a 4470mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.