Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.3 | 95.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 13, 12 |
| 2021-11-09 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.75 x 3.14 x 0.36 inches | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.65 ounces | 8.08 ounces |
| Midnight Blue | Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1750 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 SM4350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| -- | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.36 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4470mAh Nano SIM Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra is a lot better than the Nokia X100, having a score of 95.4 against 77.3. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra's design is a bit thinner but just a little heavier than the Nokia X100, and both of them were released with only 4 months difference. Both phones we compare here work with Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has the newer 13 version while Nokia X100 has Android 11 version.
The Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a bit superior processing unit than Nokia X100, and although they both have 8 cores, the Galaxy S22 Ultra also has a larger amount of RAM. Galaxy S22 Ultra has a way better looking screen than Nokia X100, because it has a higher 1440 x 3088px resolution, more pixels per screen inch and a little larger screen.
The Nokia X100 counts with a lot bigger storage capacity for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage, the Nokia X100 also has a slot for an external memory card that holds up to 1 TB. The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra features a little longer battery lifetime than Nokia X100, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
The Galaxy S22 Ultra captures much clearer pictures and videos than Nokia X100, because it has a back-facing camera with a way higher resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.