Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.3 | 92.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-11-09 | 2020-08-07 |
| 6.75 x 3.14 x 0.36 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 7.65 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Midnight Blue | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white |
| Plastic | Aluminum |
| -- | $ 603.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 SM4350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.36 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4470mAh Nano SIM Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G is much better than the Nokia X100, having a 92.3 score against 77.3. Both of these phones include the same Android 11 OS, so both should provide the same operating system features. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G design is incredibly thinner and lighter than Nokia X100, although it was released around a year before.
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a little better processing power than Nokia X100, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has 2 GB more RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a bit sharper display than Nokia X100, and although they both have a same size display, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2636 pixels and a bit higher pixel density.
The Nokia X100 counts with a bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a SD extension slot that holds a maximum of 1 TB. Galaxy Z Flip 5G shoots much clearer photos and videos than Nokia X100, although it has a back-facing camera with a lot lower resolution.
The Nokia X100 has better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has 4470mAh of battery capacity instead of 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.