Search


Compare phones

Global Score
36.740.3
Basic Information
NokiaSamsung
2010-04-292009-02-16
4.37 x 1.85 x 0.52 inches4.29 x 1.99 x 0.50 inches
2.89 ounces3.88 ounces
Black, Blue, Gray and Red--
$ 335.00$ 125.00
Display / Screen
2.2 inches2.6 inches
240 x 320 pixels (QVGA)240 x 400 pixels
TFTTFT
182 pixels per inch179 pixels per inch
No touch screenNo touch screen
6.16.4
processor processor
64 MB RAM--
GPU GPU
5.765.76
Storage
49,15 MB internal memory92,16 MB internal memory
microSD, microSDHC (up to 16 GB) external memory slotmicroSD, microSDHC external memory slot
1.40.6
Camera
5.00 MP5.00 MP
f/2.40 aperture--
320 x 240 (18 fps) (QVGA) video resolution720 x 480 (30 fps) video resolution
6.66.05
EDGE and GSMHSDPA, UMTS, EDGE and GSM
SIMSIM
0.30.9
Battery Life
860mAh Li-Ion Battery880mAh Li-Ion Battery
Removable BatteryRemovable Battery
619 hours standby time
13.5 hours talk time
350 hours standby time
4 hours talk time
2.322.4
Other Features
Bluetooth 2.1, EDRBluetooth 2.1, EDR
--GPS
--Accelerometer

Comparison review

The Samsung Ultra S has a score of 40.3, which is just a bit better than the Nokia X2's 36.7 score. The Samsung Ultra S is an older and a lot heavier cellphone than Nokia X2, but Samsung could make it just a little bit thinner anyway. The Nokia X2 and the Samsung Ultra S have extremely similar processors, both of them have a 0-Core processor.

The Samsung Ultra S features a bit sharper screen than Nokia X2, because although it has a just a bit less pixels per inch in the display, it also counts with a bigger display and a slightly better 400 x 240 resolution. Nokia X2 has a much better memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Ultra S, although it has just 49,15 MB internal storage.

Samsung Ultra S has just a bit better battery lifetime than Nokia X2, because it has an 880mAh battery capacity against 860mAh. The Nokia X2 takes a bit better videos and photos than Samsung Ultra S, although it has worse 18 fps video frame rates, they both have a same resolution camera and the same 320x240 video resolution.

In addition to being the best phone of the ones we are comparing here, the Samsung Ultra S is also by far the cheapest one.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.