Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.2 | 90.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11 |
| 2021-05-01 | 2021-08-11 |
| 6.65 x 3.14 x 0.36 inches | 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 9.56 ounces |
| Midnight Sun and Nordic Blue | Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 1080 x 2400 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| -- | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G SM4350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.20 aperture |
| 8.8 | 7.7 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4470mAh Battery | 4400mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Fold 3 has an overall score of 90.6, which is better than the Nokia X20's 77.2 general score. Both phones in this comparison review use the same Android 11 operating system, so both of them should count with identical OS features. Galaxy Z Fold 3's construction is notably thinner but somewhat heavier than Nokia X20, and both of them were only released 3 months apart.
Galaxy Z Fold 3 counts with a little bit better processing power than Nokia X20, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy Z Fold 3 also has a higher amount of RAM memory. The Galaxy Z Fold 3 and Nokia X20 count with extremely similar displays, because although the Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a just a bit worse pixel number per inch of screen, it also counts with a quite larger screen and a higher resolution of 1768 x 2208px.
Nokia X20 features a little bit more storage to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has only 128 GB internal storage, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that admits up to 512 GB. The Nokia X20 features a bit longer battery duration than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a 2% larger battery capacity.
The Nokia X20 takes better photos and videos than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a back camera with a much better 64 MP resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.