Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 47.3 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Samsung |
| Symbian Belle, Anna | -- |
| 2011-04-12 | 2016-03-11 |
| 4.71 x 2.47 x 0.47 inches | 5.61 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.15 ounces | 5.36 ounces |
| Black, Brown and Gray | Black, Gold, Pink, Pink gold, Silver and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 130.00 | $ 124.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 360 x 640 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 184 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| -- | 855 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| ARM11 (Single-Core 680 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 256 MB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 6.93 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 358,4 MB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 2.32 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 1280 x 720 (25 fps) (HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.37 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 3.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1300mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 450 hours standby time 6.5 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.04 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 3.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S7 is way better than Nokia X7, getting a general score of 79.5 against 47.3. Galaxy S7's body is extremely newer and much thinner, but also just a little heavier than Nokia X7. Galaxy S7 has a much more vibrant display than Nokia X7, because it has a much better screen pixels density, a bigger screen and a much higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels.
The Samsung Galaxy S7 counts with a much better performing processor than Nokia X7, because it has a larger amount of RAM and a larger number of cores. The Galaxy S7 counts with a much greater storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Nokia X7, because it has an external memory card slot that holds a maximum of 200 GB and 31,65 GB more internal memory.
Samsung Galaxy S7 features a much longer battery lifetime than Nokia X7, because it has 3000mAh of battery capacity instead of 1300mAh. The Samsung Galaxy S7 features a much better camera than Nokia X7, because it has a much larger diafragm aperture to capture better low light photography and videos, a lot higher 3840x2160 video definition and a much better resolution back camera.
Samsung Galaxy S7 not only is the best phones in this comparison, but it's also cheaper than the Nokia X7.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.