Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.8 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Apple |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-07-29 | 2017-11-03 |
| 6.76 x 3.21 x 0.42 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 10.02 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Granite Gre and Ultra Blue | Silver and Space gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 550.00 | $ 1149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| -- | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| 550 cd/m2 brightness | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 SM4350 chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 460 Gold, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9.18 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4630mAh Battery | 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.48 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone X has a general score of 88.1, which is a little bit better than Nokia XR20's general score of 80.8. The Apple iPhone X is an extremely older phone than Nokia XR20, but it is notably lighter and thinner anyway. The Apple iPhone X has a bit better looking display than Nokia XR20, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a little bit brighter screen, a quite better 1125 x 2436 resolution and a little better screen density.
The Nokia XR20 features a bit more memory capacity for games and applications than Apple iPhone X, because although it has just 128 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that allows up to 512 GB. IPhone X counts with a faster processor than Nokia XR20, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory and less processing cores , it also counts with a 64-bits processor.
The Nokia XR20 takes a bit better photographs and videos than Apple iPhone X, and although they both have a F1.8 camera aperture, the same (Full HD) video quality and the same video frame rate, the Nokia XR20 also has a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a much higher resolution camera.
The Nokia XR20 features a way better battery duration than Apple iPhone X, because it has 4630mAh of battery capacity.
Although iPhone X is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Nokia XR20, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Nokia XR20. If you want to save a few dollars, you can get the Nokia XR20, and give up a few features and specifications, but you will get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.