Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.8 | 84.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Apple |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-07-29 | 2018-09-21 |
| 6.76 x 3.21 x 0.42 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 10.02 ounces | 6.24 ounces |
| Granite Gre and Ultra Blue | Gold, Silver and Space gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 550.00 | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| -- | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| 550 cd/m2 brightness | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 SM4350 chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 460 Gold, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9.18 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4630mAh Battery | 2659mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.48 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone XS is slightly better than Nokia XR20, with a general score of 84.2 against 80.8. The iPhone XS is an much older cellphone than Nokia XR20, but Apple made it way thinner and incredibly lighter anyway. Apple iPhone XS counts with a quite superior hardware performance than Nokia XR20, because although it has less RAM and an inferior number of cores , it also counts with a 64 bits processing unit.
The iPhone XS counts with a bit more vivid screen than Nokia XR20, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a bit higher 1125 x 2436 resolution, a just a little greater pixels density and a bit more brightness. Nokia XR20 features a bit better camera than iPhone XS, and although they both have the same 60 fps video frame rate, the same (Full HD) video quality and a same size camera aperture, the Nokia XR20 also has a larger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a way higher resolution camera.
Nokia XR20 features a superior memory capacity for apps and games than Apple iPhone XS, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity and a slot for external memory cards that allows a maximum of 512 GB. Nokia XR20 features a much longer battery life than Apple iPhone XS, because it has 4630mAh of battery capacity instead of 2659mAh.
Although iPhone XS is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Nokia XR20, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Nokia XR20. If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can get the Nokia XR20, letting go a few features and specs, but you'll get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.