Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.8 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-07-29 | 2016-10-20 |
| 6.76 x 3.21 x 0.42 inches | 5.66 x 2.74 x 0.34 inches |
| 10.02 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Granite Gre and Ultra Blue | Black, Gray and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 550.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| -- | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| 550 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 SM4350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 460 Gold, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.18 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4630mAh Battery | 2770mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.48 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Nokia XR20 is a bit better than Google Pixel, with a global score of 80.8 against 80.2. The Nokia XR20 construction is way newer, but thicker and extremely heavier than Google Pixel. Nokia XR20 counts with a bit more powerful processing unit than Google Pixel, because it has a greater amount of RAM memory and a larger number of cores.
Nokia XR20 features a bit sharper screen than Google Pixel, because although it has a little worse pixels number in each screen inch, it also counts with a bit higher 1080 x 2400px resolution and a really bigger screen. The Nokia XR20 shoots much clearer pictures and videos than Google Pixel, and although they both have a same size camera sensor and the same video quality, the Nokia XR20 also has a back-facing camera with lot more megapixels, higher video frame rate and a bigger aperture to take better images in low light environments.
Nokia XR20 has a lot bigger storage for applications and games than Google Pixel, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the Nokia XR20 also has a SD memory slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB. Nokia XR20 counts with a superior battery performance than Google Pixel, because it has a 67% more battery capacity.
Although Nokia XR20 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Google Pixel, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Google Pixel. If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can get the Google Pixel, and give up a couple features and specs, but you'll get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.