Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.8 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-07-29 | 2017-10-19 |
| 6.76 x 3.21 x 0.42 inches | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 10.02 ounces | 6.17 ounces |
| Granite Gre and Ultra Blue | Black and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 550.00 | $ 152.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| -- | P-OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| 550 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 SM4350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 460 Gold, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4630mAh Battery | 3520mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.48 | 5.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 2 XL has a global score of 82.5, which is a little bit better than Nokia XR20's 80.8 global score. Even though Google Pixel 2 XL is a lot older than the Nokia XR20, it's body is way thinner and extremely lighter. The Google Pixel 2 XL features a little bit better screen than Nokia XR20, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with more pixels per inch of display and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2880 pixels.
The Google Pixel 2 XL counts with just a little better hardware performance than Nokia XR20, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 cpu cores. The Nokia XR20 counts with a lot bigger storage for games and applications than Google Pixel 2 XL, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Nokia XR20 also has a slot for SD memory cards that admits a maximum of 512 GB.
The Nokia XR20 counts with longer battery duration than Google Pixel 2 XL, because it has a 4630mAh battery size instead of 3520mAh. Nokia XR20 takes much better photographs and videos than Google Pixel 2 XL, and although they both have the same 1920x1080 video definition and the same aperture, the Nokia XR20 also has a camera in the back with lot more megapixels, a larger camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors and higher 60 fps video frame rate.
Even being the best phone in this comparison, Google Pixel 2 XL is also very cheap compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.