Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.8 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-07-29 | 2019-05-07 |
| 6.76 x 3.21 x 0.42 inches | 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches |
| 10.02 ounces | 5.19 ounces |
| Granite Gre and Ultra Blue | Black, Purple and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 550.00 | $ 186.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| -- | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| 550 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 SM4350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| Kryo 460 Gold, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4630mAh Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.48 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Nokia XR20 is just a bit better than the Google Pixel 3a, getting an 80.8 score against 78.8. Both phones in this review work with the same Android 11 OS (operating system). Nokia XR20 is a notably newer device than Google Pixel 3a, although it's notably heavier and way thicker. The Nokia XR20 counts with a bit better looking display than Google Pixel 3a, because although it has a bit inferior pixels number per screen inch, it also counts with a bigger screen and a slightly better 1080 x 2400px resolution.
The Nokia XR20 features a very superior storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Pixel 3a, because it has a slot for an external memory card that allows a maximum of 512 GB and 128 GB internal memory. The Nokia XR20 features just a little better hardware performance than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Nokia XR20 also has a greater amount of RAM.
The Nokia XR20 features a better camera than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have the same video definition and a same size aperture, the Nokia XR20 also has a camera with way more mega pixels, a larger camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and better 60 fps video frame rate.
The Nokia XR20 has a very superior battery life than Google Pixel 3a, because it has 4630mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Although Nokia XR20 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Google Pixel 3a, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Google Pixel 3a. So if you need that extra features, you can buy the Nokia XR20, but if you don't you can save some dollars and get the Google Pixel 3a, letting go some specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.