Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.8 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-07-29 | 2020-08-20 |
| 6.76 x 3.21 x 0.42 inches | 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches |
| 10.02 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Granite Gre and Ultra Blue | Just black |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 550.00 | $ 349.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| -- | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| 550 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 SM4350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo 460 Gold, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4630mAh Battery | 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.48 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4a has a general score of 82.9, which is slightly better than the Nokia XR20's global score of 80.8. These phones work with the same Android 11 OS, so both should provide you all the same OS features. Google Pixel 4a is an older cellphone than the Nokia XR20, but Google managed to make it way thinner and notably lighter.
Google Pixel 4a counts with a little better hardware performance than Nokia XR20. Both have the same number of cores and the same RAM amount. Nokia XR20 features a slightly better display than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has a just a little less pixels per inch of display, it also counts with a bigger display and a little higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels.
Nokia XR20 captures much clearer photos and videos than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not so good for capturing pictures or videos in low light situations, and they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video resolution, the Nokia XR20 also counts with a larger sensor, faster 60 frames per second video frame rate and a much more mega-pixels camera.
The Nokia XR20 counts with a much greater storage for games and applications than Google Pixel 4a, and although they both have equal internal memory, the Nokia XR20 also has a SD memory slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB. Nokia XR20 features a much longer battery performance than Google Pixel 4a, because it has 4630mAh of battery capacity against 3140mAh.
In addition to being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, the Google Pixel 4a is also a bargain compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.