Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.8 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | |
| Android 11 | Android 11 |
| 2021-07-29 | 2020-11-19 |
| 6.76 x 3.21 x 0.42 inches | 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches |
| 10.02 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Granite Gre and Ultra Blue | Clearly white and Just black |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 550.00 | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| -- | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| 550 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 SM4350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 460 Gold, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4630mAh Battery | 3885mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.48 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4a 5G has a score of 87.5, which is a little bit better than Nokia XR20's score of 80.8. Both devices in this comparison review include the same Android 11 OS, so you shouldn't notice any differences regarding that. The Google Pixel 4a 5G is a incredibly lighter and noticeably thinner cellphone than Nokia XR20, although both were only released 8 months apart.
The Google Pixel 4a 5G has a little better processing power than Nokia XR20. They have a 6 GB RAM memory and 8 processing cores. Nokia XR20 has a bit more vivid screen than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has a just a little inferior pixels number per inch of screen, it also counts with a quite larger screen and a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px.
The Nokia XR20 has much more memory capacity to install games and applications than Google Pixel 4a 5G, and although they both have equal internal memory capacity, the Nokia XR20 also has a SD card slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB. Nokia XR20 captures slightly better photos and videos than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not so good for shooting images or videos in low light situations, and they both have the same 1920x1080 video definition and the same 60 frames per second video frame rates, the Nokia XR20 also counts with a bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing better quality photos and videos and a back-facing camera with much more MP.
The Nokia XR20 counts with superior battery lifetime than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because it has a 19% greater battery size.
The Google Pixel 4a 5G is not only the best phones in this comparison, but it's also cheaper than the Nokia XR20, making buying this phone a simple decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.