Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.8 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | HTC |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-07-29 | 2017-02-21 |
| 6.76 x 3.21 x 0.42 inches | 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches |
| 10.02 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Granite Gre and Ultra Blue | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 550.00 | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| -- | S-LCD 5 |
| 393 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 550 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 SM4350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| Kryo 460 Gold, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.18 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4630mAh Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.48 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Nokia XR20 has an overall score of 80.8, which is a little bit better than the HTC U Ultra's 77 general score. Nokia XR20 is a incredibly newer cellphone than the HTC U Ultra, although it is way heavier and thicker. The Nokia XR20 counts with a bit better hardware performance than HTC U Ultra, because it has a greater number of cores and a higher amount of RAM.
HTC U Ultra features a screen that's just as good as the display in Nokia XR20, because although the HTC U Ultra has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher pixel density and a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution. The HTC U Ultra counts with a little bit better memory for games and applications than Nokia XR20, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Nokia XR20 has just a bit better camera than HTC U Ultra, and although they both have the same 1920x1080 video definition, a same size back-facing camera sensor and a same size camera aperture, the Nokia XR20 also has better 60 frames per second video frame rates and a much higher resolution camera.
The Nokia XR20 has a very superior battery life than HTC U Ultra, because it has a 54 percent greater battery size.
Despite of being the best phone in our comparison, Nokia XR20 is also a bargain compared to others.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.