Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.8 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | HTC |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-07-29 | 2017-05-18 |
| 6.76 x 3.21 x 0.42 inches | 6.06 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches |
| 10.02 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Granite Gre and Ultra Blue | Black, Blue, Silver and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 550.00 | $ 275.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| -- | S-LCD 5 |
| 393 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| 550 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 SM4350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 460 Gold, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4630mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.48 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Nokia XR20 is slightly better than HTC U11, getting an 80.8 score against 77.6. Even though Nokia XR20 is incredibly newer than the HTC U11, it is noticeably heavier and thicker. The HTC U11 has a bit better performance than Nokia XR20, although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have 8 cores.
The HTC U11 features a bit sharper display than Nokia XR20, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels and a greater pixel density. Nokia XR20 has a way bigger storage capacity for applications and games than HTC U11, because it has a SD extension slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB and 128 GB internal storage.
The Nokia XR20 counts with a slightly better camera than HTC U11, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture, and they both have the same 1920x1080 video quality, the Nokia XR20 also counts with faster video frame rate, a larger camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a lot more MP back-facing camera.
The Nokia XR20 features a much longer battery performance than HTC U11, because it has a 4630mAh battery size instead of 3000mAh.
Although Nokia XR20 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than HTC U11, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as HTC U11. If you prefer to save some money, you can get the HTC U11, letting go a few features and specifications, but you'll get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.