Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.8 | 77.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | LG |
| Android 11 | Android 10 |
| 2021-07-29 | 2020-05-07 |
| 6.76 x 3.21 x 0.42 inches | 6.38 x 3.02 x 0.32 inches |
| 10.02 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Granite Gre and Ultra Blue | Mirror black |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 550.00 | $ 350.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2310 x 1080 pixels |
| -- | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 398 pixels per inch |
| 550 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 SM4350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo 460 Gold, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 32.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 10.89 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4630mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.48 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Nokia XR20 has a general score of 80.8, which is a bit better than LG Q70's 77.9 score. These phones work with Android OS, but Nokia XR20 has newer 11 version while LG Q70 has Android 10 version. Nokia XR20's design is newer, but extremely heavier and way thicker than the LG Q70. Nokia XR20 has just a bit better looking display than LG Q70, because although it has a bit less pixels per inch in the screen, it also counts with a slightly higher 1080 x 2400 resolution and a little bigger display.
The LG Q70 has a little bit better storage for applications and games than Nokia XR20, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that holds up to 1,95 TB. Nokia XR20 counts with a little bit better performance than LG Q70, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Nokia XR20 also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
Nokia XR20 features just a bit better battery performance than LG Q70, because it has a 16 percent bigger battery capacity. Nokia XR20 captures clearer videos and photos than LG Q70, and although they both have the same aperture and the same (Full HD) video quality, the Nokia XR20 also has faster 60 frames per second video frame rate, a larger back camera sensor which provides a higher photo and video quality and a camera in the back with a lot higher 48 megapixels resolution.
Although Nokia XR20 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than LG Q70, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as LG Q70. If you want to save a few dollars, you can get the LG Q70, giving up a few features and specs, but you'll get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.