Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.8 | 80.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Motorola |
| Android 11 | Android 12 |
| 2021-07-29 | 2022-09-08 |
| 6.76 x 3.21 x 0.42 inches | 6.37 x 2.89 x 0.33 inches |
| 10.02 ounces | 7.00 ounces |
| Granite Gre and Ultra Blue | Interstellar Black and Starlight White |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 550.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| -- | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 550 cd/m2 brightness | 1250 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 SM4350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 SM8475 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 460 Gold, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.18 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 60.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.82 inches (1/1.22") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 14.96 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4630mAh Battery | 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.48 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra has a global score of 80.9, which is a little bit better than the Nokia XR20's 80.8 global score. Both of these devices have Android OS, but the Motorola Edge 30 Ultra has a newer 12 version and Nokia XR20 has Android 11 version, providing a couple additional features and performance tweaks. The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra construction is newer, lighter and a lot thinner than Nokia XR20.
The Nokia XR20 features a much greater processing power than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, because although it has a lower amount of RAM, it also counts with a greater number of cores (and also faster). Motorola Edge 30 Ultra features a bit more vivid screen than Nokia XR20, and although they both have a greater amount of pixels per display inch, a display with the same size and the same 1080 x 2400 resolution, the Motorola Edge 30 Ultra also has a much brighter display.
The Nokia XR20 has a lot bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Nokia XR20 also has an external SD slot that holds up to 512 GB. The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra has a lot better camera than Nokia XR20, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not good for capturing photos and videos in low-light situations, it also counts with a back facing camera with lot more mega-pixels, a much larger sensor capturing much higher quality photographs and a lot higher video quality.
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra features just a bit better battery performance than Nokia XR20, because it has an 8 percent bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.