Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.8 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Motorola |
| Android 11 | Android 14 |
| 2021-07-29 | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.76 x 3.21 x 0.42 inches | 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 10.02 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Granite Gre and Ultra Blue | Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 550.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| -- | P-OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 550 cd/m2 brightness | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 SM4350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 460 Gold, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.18 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 10.89 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4630mAh Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.48 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is a bit better than Nokia XR20, having a global score of 87.1 against 80.8. Both of these devices use Android OS (Operating System), but Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a newer 14 version and Nokia XR20 has Android 11, so it provides you a lot of extra features and performance tweaks. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra design is noticeably newer, somewhat thinner and incredibly lighter than the Nokia XR20.
Nokia XR20 features a way better hardware performance than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a much better display than Nokia XR20, and although they both have the same exact resolution of 1080 x 2400px, a screen with the same size and a greater number of pixels per screen inch, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also has much more brightness.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a much better memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Nokia XR20, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage capacity. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra shoots much better pictures and videos than Nokia XR20, because it has a much bigger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors, a way better (4K) video quality, a back camera with more mega-pixels and a bigger diafragm aperture.
The Nokia XR20 features a bit superior battery duration than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, because it has a 4630mAh battery capacity instead of 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.