Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.8 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Motorola |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-07-29 | 2020-04-16 |
| 6.76 x 3.21 x 0.42 inches | 6.29 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches |
| 10.02 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Granite Gre and Ultra Blue | Smoke black |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 550.00 | $ 150.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| -- | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| 550 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 SM4350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| Kryo 460 Gold, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4630mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.48 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Nokia XR20 is a little bit better than the Moto G Power, with a global score of 80.8 against 76.1. Both of these phones come with the same Android 11 OS. Nokia XR20's design is newer than the Moto G Power's, although it's just a little thicker and notably heavier. Nokia XR20 counts with a little more vivid display than Moto G Power, because although it has a bit lower pixel density, it also counts with a bit bigger display and a little higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels.
Nokia XR20 counts with a little bit better performance than Moto G Power, and although they both have 8 cores, the Nokia XR20 also has a greater amount of RAM. Nokia XR20 counts with a very superior memory to store more apps and games than Motorola Moto G Power, and although they both have a SD card slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB, the Nokia XR20 also has 128 GB internal memory capacity.
Motorola Moto G Power counts with just a bit better battery performance than Nokia XR20, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4630mAh. The Nokia XR20 features just a bit better camera than Moto G Power, because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have the same 1920x1080 video quality, the Nokia XR20 also counts with a much more MP back camera, better 60 frames per second video frame rate and a bigger sensor.
Although Nokia XR20 is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Motorola Moto G Power, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Motorola Moto G Power. If you are trying to save some dollars, you can get Motorola Moto G Power, letting go a few features and specs, but you'll get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.