Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.8 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Motorola |
| Android 11 | Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2021-07-29 | 2016-09-01 |
| 6.76 x 3.21 x 0.42 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 10.02 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Granite Gre and Ultra Blue | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 550.00 | $ 250.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| -- | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| 550 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 SM4350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 460 Gold, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4630mAh Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.48 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Nokia XR20 is slightly better than Moto Z Force, with a general score of 80.8 against 75.8. The Nokia XR20 design is incredibly newer than the Moto Z Force's, but it's extremely thicker and noticeably heavier. These phones include Android OS (Operating System), but the Nokia XR20 has 11 version and Moto Z Force has Android 7.0 Nougat.
The Nokia XR20 has a little faster CPU than Moto Z Force, because it has a greater amount of RAM and 4 more cores. Moto Z Force counts with a little sharper display than Nokia XR20, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a better display density and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560.
Nokia XR20 captures a little bit better photos and videos than Moto Z Force, and although they both have a same size camera aperture and the same 1920x1080 video quality, the Nokia XR20 also has a lot more mega-pixels back-facing camera and better 60 fps video frame rate. The Moto Z Force has a slightly bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Nokia XR20, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Nokia XR20 counts with superior battery life than Moto Z Force, because it has 4630mAh of battery capacity instead of 3500mAh.
Although Nokia XR20 is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Moto Z Force, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Moto Z Force. So if you want that extra specs, you can buy the Nokia XR20, otherwise you can save a couple dollars and get the Moto Z Force, letting go a couple specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.