Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.8 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Motorola |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-07-29 | 2017-08-10 |
| 6.76 x 3.21 x 0.42 inches | 6.13 x 2.99 x 0.24 inches |
| 10.02 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Granite Gre and Ultra Blue | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 550.00 | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| -- | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| 550 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 SM4350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 460 Gold, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4630mAh Battery | 2730mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.48 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Nokia XR20 is slightly better than Moto Z2 Force Edition, with an 80.8 score against 77.4. Although Nokia XR20 is extremely newer than the Moto Z2 Force Edition, it's heavier and way thicker. The Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition has a bit superior processor than Nokia XR20, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 processing cores.
Moto Z2 Force Edition counts with just a bit better screen than Nokia XR20, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better pixel density and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels. Moto Z2 Force Edition features a slightly better memory for games and applications than Nokia XR20, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD extension slot that admits up to 1,95 TB.
Nokia XR20 shoots much clearer photographs and videos than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have the same 1920x1080 video definition, the Nokia XR20 also has a bigger aperture to take better photography and videos in poorly lited situations, higher 60 fps video frame rate, a back-facing camera with lot more megapixels and a much larger back camera sensor which gives a much higher image and video quality.
Nokia XR20 has a much longer battery duration than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has 4630mAh of battery capacity instead of 2730mAh.
Nokia XR20 not only is the best phones in our comparison, but it's also by far the cheapest one, which makes buying this phone an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.