Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.8 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Motorola |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-07-29 | 2017-06-29 |
| 6.76 x 3.21 x 0.42 inches | 6.15 x 3.00 x 0.24 inches |
| 10.02 ounces | 5.11 ounces |
| Granite Gre and Ultra Blue | Gold, Gray and Silver |
| Plastic and Plastic | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 550.00 | $ 200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| -- | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 401 pixels per inch |
| 550 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 SM4350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 460 Gold, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 720 x 480 (480 fps) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4630mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.48 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Nokia XR20 has a score of 80.8, which is slightly better than Moto Z2 Play's 77.4 general score. Even though Nokia XR20 is much newer than the Moto Z2 Play, it's extremely heavier and noticeably thicker. Motorola Moto Z2 Play has a processing unit that is just as good as Nokia XR20's CPU, and although the Motorola Moto Z2 Play has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
The Nokia XR20 features just a bit better looking screen than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, because although it has a just a little worse pixels number in each inch in the display, it also counts with a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2400 and a larger screen. Nokia XR20 features a superior camera than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture, and they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video quality, the Nokia XR20 also counts with a back facing camera with lot more megapixels and faster video frame rates.
The Motorola Moto Z2 Play has slightly more memory capacity for applications and games than Nokia XR20, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external memory slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Nokia XR20 counts with a much longer battery duration than Moto Z2 Play, because it has a 4630mAh battery capacity.
Although Nokia XR20 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Moto Z2 Play, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Moto Z2 Play. So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy the Nokia XR20, but if you don't you can save some dollars and get the Moto Z2 Play, resigning a couple specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.