Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.8 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Motorola |
| Android 11 | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2021-07-29 | 2018-08-16 |
| 6.76 x 3.21 x 0.42 inches | 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches |
| 10.02 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Granite Gre and Ultra Blue | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 550.00 | $ 297.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| -- | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| 550 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 SM4350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 460 Gold, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4630mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.48 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Nokia XR20 has a general score of 80.8, which is a little bit better than the Moto Z3's 77.6 general score. The Nokia XR20 construction is much newer than the Moto Z3's, but it is way thicker and a lot heavier. Both of these phones use Android OS (Operating System), but the Nokia XR20 has the previous 11 version while Moto Z3 has Android 9.0 Pie version.
Nokia XR20 counts with a little bit better display than Moto Z3, because although it has a little worse pixel count per inch in the screen, it also counts with a little bit bigger screen and a slightly better 1080 x 2400 resolution. The Moto Z3 has a bit more powerful processing unit than Nokia XR20, although it has 2 GB lesser RAM, they both have 8 cores.
Nokia XR20 features a superior camera than Moto Z3, and although they both have the same video definition, the Nokia XR20 also has a way bigger back camera sensor capturing lot better quality photographs and videos, a larger aperture, a back facing camera with a much better 48 mega-pixels resolution and faster video frame rates.
Moto Z3 counts with just a bit more storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Nokia XR20, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. Nokia XR20 has a way better battery duration than Motorola Moto Z3, because it has 4630mAh of battery capacity.
Although Nokia XR20 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Motorola Moto Z3, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Motorola Moto Z3. So if you want that extra features and specs, you can buy Nokia XR20, but if you don't you can save some money and buy the Motorola Moto Z3, letting go a couple specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.