Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.8 | 76.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Motorola |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-07-29 | 2018-06-29 |
| 6.76 x 3.21 x 0.42 inches | 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches |
| 10.02 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Granite Gre and Ultra Blue | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 550.00 | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| -- | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| 550 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 SM4350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset |
| Kryo 460 Gold, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 509 GPU |
| 9.18 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 10.89 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4630mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.48 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Nokia XR20 has a score of 80.8, which is a bit better than Motorola Moto Z3 Play's 76.3 global score. Although Nokia XR20 is noticeably newer than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, it's way heavier and extremely thicker. Nokia XR20 counts with a little sharper display than Moto Z3 Play, because although it has a just a bit less pixels per screen inch, it also counts with a bit higher 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution and a little bit larger display.
The Motorola Moto Z3 Play counts with slightly more storage capacity for games and applications than Nokia XR20, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. Nokia XR20 features a little bit better processing power than Moto Z3 Play, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Nokia XR20 also has 2 GB more RAM memory.
The Nokia XR20 features a superior battery life than Moto Z3 Play, because it has 4630mAh of battery capacity. The Nokia XR20 shoots better pictures and videos than Moto Z3 Play, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not good for taking photographs and/or video in low light situations, and they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video resolution, the Nokia XR20 also counts with faster 60 frames per second video frame rates, a larger back-facing camera sensor taking higher quality videos and photographs and a way higher resolution camera in the back.
The Nokia XR20 is a bit more expensive than the Motorola Moto Z3 Play, but you can get a better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.