Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.8 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Motorola |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-07-29 | 2019-12-04 |
| 6.76 x 3.21 x 0.42 inches | 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 10.02 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Granite Gre and Ultra Blue | Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 550.00 | $ 350.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| -- | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| 550 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 SM4350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo 460 Gold, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4630mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.48 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Nokia XR20 has a score of 80.8, which is slightly better than the Motorola One Hyper's 79.8 score. Both phones we are comparing here work with the same Android 11 OS (Operating System), so you shouldn't perceive any difference regarding that. The Nokia XR20 body is newer, but thicker and noticeably heavier than Motorola One Hyper.
Nokia XR20 features a little bit better display than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has a little lower screen pixels density, it also counts with a bit larger display and a quite better 1080 x 2400 resolution. The Motorola One Hyper counts with a bit bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than Nokia XR20, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the Motorola One Hyper also has a slot for external memory cards that allows up to 1000 GB.
Nokia XR20 features just a little better hardware performance than Motorola One Hyper, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Nokia XR20 also has a higher amount of RAM memory. Nokia XR20 counts with a little better battery performance than Motorola One Hyper, because it has 4630mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh.
The Motorola One Hyper takes slightly better photos and videos than Nokia XR20, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture, it also counts with a much higher 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a back-facing camera with a way better 64 mega pixels resolution.
Although Nokia XR20 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Motorola One Hyper, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Motorola One Hyper. So if you want that extra features, you can buy the Nokia XR20, otherwise you can save some dollars and get the Motorola One Hyper, giving up a couple features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.