Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.8 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | |
| Android 11 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-07-29 | 2019-10-16 |
| 6.76 x 3.21 x 0.42 inches | 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches |
| 10.02 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| Granite Gre and Ultra Blue | Cyber shade |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 550.00 | $ 600.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| -- | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| 550 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 SM4350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset |
| Kryo 460 Gold, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4630mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.48 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Nokia XR20 has an overall score of 80.8, which is slightly better than nubia Red Magic 3S's general score of 75.8. These devices include Android operating system, but Nokia XR20 has 11 version and nubia Red Magic 3S has Android 9.0 Pie version. Nokia XR20's construction is newer than nubia Red Magic 3S's, but it is notably heavier and just a bit thicker.
The Nokia XR20 features a bit more vivid display than nubia Red Magic 3S, and although they both have a display of the same size, the Nokia XR20 also has a just a little greater display pixels density and a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2400px. Nokia XR20 features a little bit more memory for games and applications than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has just 128 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that allows a maximum of 512 GB.
The nubia Red Magic 3S counts with a bit better performance than Nokia XR20, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has a greater amount of RAM memory. The nubia Red Magic 3S features a little bit better camera than Nokia XR20, and although they both have a same resolution camera, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has a bigger sensor taking better quality photographs, a way higher video quality and a larger aperture to take better low light captures.
Nubia Red Magic 3S has just a little bit longer battery life than Nokia XR20, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 4630mAh.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones we are comparing here, Nokia XR20 is also cheaper than the other phone.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.