Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.8 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 14 |
| 2021-07-29 | 2023-12-16 |
| 6.76 x 3.21 x 0.42 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches |
| 10.02 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Granite Gre and Ultra Blue | Blue Black and Light Blue |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 550.00 | $ 200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| -- | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| 550 cd/m2 brightness | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 SM4350 chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 6100+ (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 460 Gold, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 GPU |
| 9.18 | 6.03 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 10.89 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 9.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4630mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.48 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Nokia XR20 is just a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy A15 5G, with an 80.8 score against 77.4. These devices have Android operating system, but Nokia XR20 has an older 11 version and Samsung Galaxy A15 5G has Android 14. Despite being the best phone in this comparison, Nokia XR20 is an a lot older, noticeably heavier and noticeably thicker phone than Samsung Galaxy A15 5G.
Galaxy A15 5G features a bit more vivid screen than Nokia XR20, because although it has a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2340px and a quite smaller display, it also counts with a just a little higher pixel count in each inch in the screen and more screen brightness. The Nokia XR20 counts with a much powerful CPU than Galaxy A15 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Nokia XR20 also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
The Nokia XR20 has a slightly better camera than Galaxy A15 5G, although it has a lower 1920x1080 video definition and a back facing camera with a lower resolution, they both have a F1.8 aperture. The Galaxy A15 5G has a little bit better memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Nokia XR20, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage, the Galaxy A15 5G also has a slot for SD memory cards that supports a maximum of 1000 GB.
The Galaxy A15 5G counts with just a little better battery duration than Nokia XR20, because it has an 8 percent bigger battery size.
Although Nokia XR20 is a better device, it is way more expensive than Samsung Galaxy A15 5G, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Samsung Galaxy A15 5G. If you prefer to save a few dollars, you can buy Samsung Galaxy A15 5G, and give up a few features and specs, but you will get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.