Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.8 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 14 |
| 2021-07-29 | 2023-12-11 |
| 6.76 x 3.21 x 0.42 inches | 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 10.02 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Granite Gre and Ultra Blue | Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 550.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| -- | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| 550 cd/m2 brightness | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 SM4350 chipset | Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 460 Gold, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Mali-G68 GPU |
| 9.18 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 10.89 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 9.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4630mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.48 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Nokia XR20 has a global score of 80.8, which is a bit better than the Galaxy A25 5G's general score of 79.9. Even being the best device we are comparing here, the Nokia XR20 body is noticeably older, noticeably thicker and noticeably heavier than Galaxy A25 5G. These phones have Android OS (operating system), but the Nokia XR20 has the older 11 version while Galaxy A25 5G has Android 14 version.
The Nokia XR20 has a very superior processor than Samsung Galaxy A25 5G. Both have 6 GB of RAM memory and the same number of cores. Samsung Galaxy A25 5G has a bit sharper display than Nokia XR20, because although it has a little worse 1080 x 2340 resolution and a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a way brighter screen and a little bit higher pixels quantity per inch in the display.
The Galaxy A25 5G has just a bit more storage capacity to install games and applications than Nokia XR20, and although they both have equal internal storage capacity, the Galaxy A25 5G also has a SD memory card expansion slot that supports up to 1 TB. Galaxy A25 5G shoots a bit better pictures and videos than Nokia XR20, because although it has a tinier camera sensor taking less light and duller colors, and they both have the same diafragm aperture, the Galaxy A25 5G also counts with a back camera with a higher resolution and a way better 3840x2160 video definition.
Samsung Galaxy A25 5G has just a bit better battery performance than Nokia XR20, because it has an 8 percent more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.